Thursday, March 24, 2011

Awesome HOD Reference

So since Corbin shared a video with us, I thought I would too:

http://www.ted.com/talks/isabel_behncke_evolution_s_gift_of_play_from_bonobo_apes_to_humans.html

The key part is from 1:48 to 2:15. Notice how she talks about the Congo being a place of paradox and beauty. Sound familiar? :)

Anyway, enjoy!

Monday, March 14, 2011

The Voice of Marlow

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i5jnJdnQPr8&feature=related
Starts his monologue around 1:40. Watch the whole thing :)

Monday, February 28, 2011

P and G- it begins!

Hi Everyone,

I hope you check this!

Greene actually wrote the book when he was in exile in Mexico due to a libel suite by a young Shirley Temple. Greene wrote an unfavorable review of her performance in a magazine and as a result, faced legal actions. Since the crime was "severe" he was threatened with jail if he was to return to England. As a result, his publisher financed his trip. Most of the characters in PandG are based on real characters who he met when he was there. Please make sure that you research the political background of Mexico during this time before you read tonight. Thank goodness for the internet!

Saturday, February 12, 2011

Contemporary Poetry

I chose "Coloring" by Ronald Koertge because I thought the juxtaposition within the poem was a very different technique. In this poem, Koertge contrasts the childish art of coloring with all of these terrible things like gangrene, sores, nausea, and the Ku Klux Klan. Each color is made to represent a different one of these terrible things. In doing this Koertge employs color imagery so that the diseases and groups he talks about fit the colors; sores are red, the Klan's outfits are white. The use of this juxtaposition bridges two stages of life. As one grows older, the colors one puts on the paper begin to mean more than just random choices. This is why in the third stanza, Koertge stresses that no one has ever majored in coloring in college or won any prizes as an adult. These sort of phrases are hyperbolic in the sense that they take this childish activity to a highly adult level. At the end of the third stanza, the phrase can't see you now is repeated three times in order to stress the point that this idea is so ridiculous of regressing to childish behavior and we would never hear these sort of excuses. In the fourth stanza, he then goes on to explain the cause of this loss of innocence. He blames the whole thing on puberty. He says that this stage in life opens up our view of the world for what it truly is.

The second poem I chose was "Forgotten Planet" by Doug Dorph. In this poem, flashback, hyperbole, simile, and repetition are used to explore a child's imagination. The first stanza, starts in the present and then flashes back to her own childhood. There are many enjambed lines here which give the poem a narrative feel. He is telling us the story of his childhood. There is then a simile; comparing her father's bulk to that of gravity. The last line of stanza two is a hyperbole saying that she can reach out and poke the sky with her finger it seems so close. He then goes onto say that he has lost this imagination as he has aged and enjoys seeing it through his daughter. His daughter reminds him of this imagination which is why he uses the simile at the end of stanza three that says he spies like a voyeur through his daughter's eyes. In stanza four, he repeats the phrase "On Plunis" making Plunis the place of his imagination. He can go there to be happy and to escape the stresses of his real life. On Plunis, he can be a child again and everything can be ok.

Tuesday, January 18, 2011

Crime and Punishment - Final Day

I agree with #4. I believe Crime and Punishment is not merely a look into a specific historical period, a certain type of society, or a study of a distinct character; rather, this novel embraces a variety of theories that carry universal regard. One of the "conflict of ideas" that appear in the book is nihilism versus Christianity/altruism. Although these ideas can be interpreted differently within the novel, the overall conclusion I absorbed was that nihilism, or to believe in nothing and share no loyalties, makes life seemingly futile: "And if in eight years he would be thirty-two and could still begin a new life, what difference did it make? What did he have to live for? What could he look forward to? What was he after?" (515). Living an existence of purpose, humility, and love makes those in the novel who embody these qualities more creditable, such as Marmeladov, Razu, and Sonia. At the end, it at least seems that Rasky's revelation (upon kissing Sonia's feet) has drawn him to the same conclusion: "Love resurrected them; the heart of one contained infinite sources of life for the heart of the other" (521). The overarching theory of existentialism, or the existential crisis, is a key factor in the book, and Dostoyevsky shows how it impacts men in all times and places. Each character has a different perspective on what is the point of life, and this idea is intensely questioned in the landscape of a crime and its repercussions. To Rasky, there is little point in a life unless you are helping the greater good; he compares this idea to other time periods by comparing his crime to the heroic actions of Napoleon (although citing that Nap succeeded while he failed). To Sonia, life is only as full as the amount of faith and love you bring to it, which is evident in her response to Rasky: "What would I be without God?" The characters and plot of the novel are simply vehicles (or symbols) in which to analyze the universal ideas of morality, repentance, existence, etc., rather than just convey their effect on a certain historical period or a specific individual.

Monday, January 3, 2011

Words for Crime and Punishment

I chose Nihilism because I had never heard of the word before. Nihilism is a philosophical term that is related to extreme pessimism. These people are extremely impulsive and have no loyalties to people. They just look to destroy. So clearly this is a very negative philosophy and it will be interesting to see how it ties into the book. From what I know about the author and the book so far, Dostoyevsky was a pretty negative guy who really couldn't do much right so that could be part of the reason that he writes about such a terrible philosophy. He was really depressed all of the time because he had no money. Also, I think this sort of impulsive view on the world is probably conveyed through the main character Rodya because we know that he tries to kill the woman who lends him money. Overall, it will be interesting to see where all of this goes maybe it will make more sense once I read and once other people post about the other words.